🔗 Share this article

It's Black History Month in the United Kingdom, and it feels like it’s time for a re-evaluation. As time has passed, an celebration that began as a celebration and reminder of the past, cultural identity and bonds between Black populations worldwide, has adopted a corporate feel, broadening to incorporate functions where African descendants are paid to address predominantly white listeners about implicit prejudice and active solidarity. The 2020s Black Lives Matter protests created a surge in the business of demonstrating racial awareness. But even that moment has passed. The tide has crested, leaving a sort of hollowed out legacy of what raising awareness is for.

The Origins of Black History Month

First commemorated in the US and Canada, Black History Month was conceived in 1962 as a week dedicated to Negro history by Black scholar Carter G. Woodson with seven days of celebration and reflection in the February's second week. Black History Month grew out of this initiative and was publicly established in 1970. Now it is celebrated not only in the North America in winter, but also in the tenth month in the UK, the Federal Republic of Germany, the Republic of Ireland and the Holland.

The period has evolved since its inception, focusing less on the narratives of colonial slavery and fights for racial justice, and greater focus on influential individuals of color in public life, creative fields, and advocacy, and widely honoring the contribution Black people have made to shape the country. It is in learning environments where Black History Month is most regularly observed, with lectures and artistic activities. But the method the celebration is celebrated is a reflection of the current political situation. How it evolves is a good lesson in how co-option leads to erosion: the restructuring of Black History Month has impeded the point of it, which is to tackle systemic and institutional racism.

---

A Jarring Moment

Little demonstrates how crucial it is to rethink Black History Month more than the current time in which it takes place this year. In the United Kingdom, a resurgent right in the guise of the Reform organization is ahead in surveys. In the warmer months we observed the most significant ultra-conservative gathering in British history. a prominent political figure, the African descendant in charge of the Conservative party, is a firm opponent of Black Lives Matter, and we are in a position where a member of parliament gains confidence to declare that a lack of white people in parts of a city is a cause for alarm. Simultaneously, ultra-nationalist movements are expanding in Europe as a entirety.

In the America, a massive attack against inclusion programs and preferential policies has been carried, often successfully, to the highest courts of the nation. A drive to remove African American heritage and narrative from the records is ongoing. One of Donald Trump's initial presidential directives aimed at the museum of African American legacy, and the prestigious establishment, accusing them of a coordinated and broad attempt to alter the country's historical narrative” by depicting the United States “as inherently racist”.

Given these circumstances, the celebration symbolises how insufficiently it can be influential if it is confined to either obligatory business commemorations, or depoliticized commemorations of former accomplishments, rather than addressing the situation of the present. It also shows how its restricted time span means that it is separated from the more extensive continuous action that is required. An academic expert, a educator at University of Greenwich, articulated it most accurately when she voiced worries about the fleeting superficial actions of the observance. “The problem with adopting a symbolic stance”, she wrote, “is that it typically leads to that Black History Month turns into a fleeting performance rather than a driver of transformation.”

---

Rethinking, But Not Jettisoning

Figuring out how to adjust, modify and expand efforts for racial equality and recognition in such times of discouragement and concern is a difficult task. There is a urge to just discontinue events including Black History Month altogether, assuming they are no longer suitable, or are vestiges of an time that has failed to deliver.

Yet, in spite of all this, Black History Month, and in fact the complete comprehensive structure and tradition of campaigns for equality – local anti-racism groups, DEI programs, and indeed, including corporate presentations – constitute an framework that a lot of work has been dedicated to. It is there not just to decay as the situation evolves (and in fact, declines), but to be a dynamic entity.

So what would a contemporary active Black History Month look like? To begin with, it would be more than a single focused period: something that is distributed across all seasons (as certain organizations are already commencing), elements of its material (particularly around prominent figures of color) incorporated into educational programs. It would also be a era that does not evade political issues, and provides room for people, particularly young people, to share their anxieties and narratives. What value has mere awareness of the bygone era when it ignores the present reality of extreme conservative demonstrations in the street? Organizations who mark it should not be reassured with the neutral terminology of implicit prejudice and awareness of subtle slights, but challenged by the risks that face all if fight against prejudice is not taken seriously. In short, Black History Month should be made up-to-date, pressing, and reactive. Perhaps an entire name rebrand is in order – Present-Day African Heritage Celebration.